EFFECTS OF LANGUAGE USE IN THE TRIAL OF THE PREMEDITATED MURDER CASE OF BRIGADIER JOSHUA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v8i2.2854Keywords:
Language In Trials, Criminal Law, Murder CasesAbstract
This study discusses the use of language in the context of criminal justice. The aims of this research are (1) to reveal the language used in the trial of the murder of Brigadier Joshua by the parties involved, such as witnesses, lawyers, judges, and defendants, and (2) to reveal the impact of the use of language in the trial of the murder of Brigadier Joshua on the outcome end of trial and justice in the criminal justice system. Data source from Kompas TV's YouTube channel. This research method is descriptive qualitative. Data collection techniques uses observation and note-taking techniques. Then, the data analysis technique uses the Miles and Huberman model, namely data reduction, data exposure, and conclusion. The result of this research is that the research found the language used in the trial by the related parties: (1) straightforward language, (2) accurate language, (3) effective language, and (4) relevant language. Then, the research also found 3 impacts of the use of language in the trial of the Brigadier Joshua murder case on the final outcome of the trial and justice in the criminal justice system, namely: (1) legal impact, (2) psychological impact, and (3) social impact.
Downloads
References
Aji, A. B. W., Wiyatno, P., Arifin, R., & Kamal, U. (2020). Social Justice on Environmental Law Enforcement in Indonesia: The Contemporary and Controversial Cases. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 2(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/IJICLE.V2I1.37324
Bérubé, M., Tang, T. U., Fortin, F., Ozalp, S., Williams, M. L., & Burnap, P. (2020). Social media forensics applied to assessment of post–critical incident social reaction: The case of the 2017 Manchester Arena terrorist attack. Forensic Science International, 313, 110364. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORSCIINT.2020.110364
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. New York: Routledge.
Estuningtyas, R. D. (2021). Strategi Komunikasi dan Dakwah Pada Kalangan Milenial di Era Modernisasi. Muttaqien; Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Islamic Studies, 2(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.52593/MTQ.02.1.05
Fadli, I., & Kasmawati, K. (2020). Maksim Kerja Sama Berbahasa Model Grice dalam Peristiwa Tutur Di Pasar Tramo Kabupaten Maros: Kajian Pragmatik. Jurnal Idiomatik: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.46918/IDIOMATIK.V3I2.675
Hailes, O. (2022). Lithium in International Law: Trade, Investment, and the Pursuit of Supply Chain Justice. Journal of International Economic Law, 25(1), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/JIEL/JGAC002
Halid, R. (2022). Tindak Tutur Pelaku Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial Kajian Linguistik Forensik. KREDO : Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(2), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.24176/KREDO.V5I2.6342
Handayani, N., Amir, J., & Juanda, J. (2021). Kasus Hoaks Pandemi Covid-19: Suatu Tinjauan Linguistik Forensik. Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 17(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.25134/fon.v17i2.4432
Hartini, L., Saifullah, A. R., & Sudana, D. (2020). Linguistik Forensik terhadap Perbuatan Tidak Menyenangkan di Media Sosial (Kajian Pragmatik). Deiksis, 12(03), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.30998/DEIKSIS.V12I03.5416
Kartika, A. (2020). The Urgency of the Criminal Provision Regulationss in Cooperatives Law at Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3(2), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.33258/BIRCI.V3I2.922
Kusno, A. (2021). Redefinisi Kosakata Terkait Perang Bahasa (Kajian Linguistik Forensik). Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 4(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.30872/DIGLOSIA.V4I3.183
Laku, F. K., Pongoh, J. K., & Barama, M. (2021). Wewenang Kejaksaan dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. LEX CRIMEN, 10(1), 54–62. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/32025
Lintang, K., & Nugroho, S. (2021). Criminal Law Policy of Justice Collaborator in Corruption Crime Case. LAW REFORM, 17(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.14710/LR.V17I1.37550
Manullang, S. O. (2021). Understanding the sociology of customary law in the reformation era: complexity and diversity of society in Indonesia. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.21744/LINGCURE.V5NS3.1352
Muqita, B., & Mentari, R. (2020). Saksi Pidana Pembunuhan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dengan Hukum Islam. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.56087/AIJIH.V23I1.33
Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode Penelitian. Surabaya: Cipta Media Nusantara.
Retnosari, I. E., & Pujiastuti, R. (2021). Maksim Kuantitas dan Maksim Kualitas dalam Tuturan Bahasa Indonesia pada Anak Disabilitas Intelektual. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 10(2), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.26499/RNH.V10I2.4053
Sahara, M. U. (2020). Prinsip Kerja Sama Grice pada Percakapan Film. BASINDO : Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia, Dan Pembelajarannya, 4(2), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.17977/UM007V4I22020P222-232
Sanubarianto, S. T. (2021). Implikatur Ungkapan Bahasa Daerah dalam gugatan Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik di NTT: Sebuah Studi Kasus Linguistik Forensik. Haluan Sastra Budaya, 5(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.20961/HSB.V5I1.44803
Sarifuddin, Tadjuddin, M., & Iswary, E. (2021). A Hate and Provocative Speech Act in Social Media: A Forensic Linguistics Study. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 4(3), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.34050/ELSJISH.V4I3.18196
Sarosa, S. (2021). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius.
Satria, H. (2022). Implikatur Percakapan Interogasi Terhadap Saksi/Korban Penganiayaan: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. JURNAL ILMU BUDAYA, 10(2), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.34050/JIB.V10I2.19830
Shabrina, S. N., Zamzani, & Setiawan, T. (2022). Analisis teks hoaks seputar informasi bank: Kajian bahasa perspektif analisis wacana kritis dan linguistik forensik. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 8(2), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.22219/KEMBARA.V8I2.21478
Solikhah, I. Z., Janah, N. M., & Sidik, M. (2020). Kesalahan Berbahasa Tataran Semantik dalam Unggahan Instagram @Kominfodiy. Lingua Rima: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.31000/LGRM.V9I2.2896
Sugiri, B., Aprilianda, N., Hartadi, H., Narapidana, K., Kejahatan, P., & Abstrak, T. (2021). The Position of Convict as Justice Collaborator in Revealing Organized Crime. PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW), 8(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.22304/PJIH.V8N2.A5
Ulin Nuha, A., Fathurohman, I., & Ristiyani. (2022). Analisis Curhat Korban Kejahatan Asusila Menggunakan Pendekatan Semantik: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. KREDO : Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(2), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.24176/KREDO.V5I2.7219
Zumaro, I. J. (2021). Implikatur Percakapan dalam Sinetron “Dunia Tebalik” Episode ke-2006-2007 di RCTI: Kajian Pragmatik. Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajaran, 10(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.35194/ALINEA.V10I1.1250
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Kata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
