CHARACTERS OF MINANGKABAU PEOPLE THROUGH EXPRESSION AS SEEN ON POLITICAL ASPECTS

KARAKTER ORANG MINANGKABAU MELALUI UNGKAPAN DITINJAU DARI ASPEK POLITIK

Authors

  • M Sayuti Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Ali Mardius Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Efrianto Efrianto STKIP Pesisir Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v6i1.370

Keywords:

Minangkabau Character, Political

Abstract

This study aims to describe the character of the Minangkabau community through their expressions reviewed from the political aspect. This is a descriptive qualitative research, sample of 60 people are randomly assigned to represent traditional stakeholders. The research instrument is a questionnaire. The informen came from the core area of Minangkabau. It was found that the character of the Minangkabau people was based on two systems; the Koto Piliang harmony system pioneered by Datuk Ketumanggungan and the Bodi Caniago harmony system was pioneered by Datuk Perpatih Nan Sabatang political system emanates from the earth. These opposing systems produce two systems based on: democracy, egalitarianism, and social justice aspects. In political democracy, Minangkabau people making decisions through deliberation to reach consensus, which is expressed by "bulat air ke pembuluh, bulat kata ke mufakat". Politically egalitarian they put themselves wherever they are which is expressed by "di mana bumi dipijak di situ langit dijunjung". In terms of socio-political justice, through the spirit of trading habit, they help each other by sharing their feelings and concerns, which are expressed as "berat sama dipikul ringan sama dijinjing."

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andheska, H. (2018). Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Minangkabau Dalam Ungkapan Kepercayaan Rakyat. BASINDO : Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia, Dan Pembelajarannya, 2(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.17977/um007v2i12018p022

Arifin, Z., & Gani, H. (2007). Relasi Dua Kepentingan (Budaya Politik Masyarakat Minangkabau). Harmonia Journal of Arts Research and Education, 8(3), 15–25.

Asmaniar. (2018). Perkawinan Adat Minangkabau. Bina Mulya Hukum, 7(2).

Budiningsih. (2004). Pembelajaran Moral. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Efrianto, E., & Afnita, A. (2019). The Politeness of Bungo Pasang Language Using Kato Nan Ampek in Minangkabau. Jurnal Kata: Penelitian Tentang Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 3(1), 58–75.

Errington. (1984). Manner and Meaning in West Sumatera: The Social Context of Consciousness. New York: Yale University. Jurnal Minangkabau 2015 (3). (n.d.).

Yendra. (2016). Penerapan Sosiolinguistik Dalam Memahami Sosiokultural Minangkabau Untuk Pendidikan Karakter; Cime’Eh Dan Insya Allah Orang Minangkabau. Jurnal Iptek Terapan, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22216/jit.v10i1.466-975

Naldo, J. (2019). Islam dan Modal Sosial Orang Minangkabau di Perantauan. Jurnal Penelitian, 13(2), 267.

Pangulu, M. S. D. R., Fikri, H., Syofiani, S., & Isnanda, R. (2022). Marriage System in Minangkabau Culture: Temporary Minangkabau People’S Perception. Journal of Cultura and Lingua, 3(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.37301/culingua.v3i1.106

Prayitno. (2014). Konseling Integritas. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.

Prayitno. (2018). Konseling Profesional yang Berhasil : Layanan dan Kegiatan Pendukung. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sahrul N. (2015). Estetika Struktur dan Estetika Tekstur Pertunjukan Teater Wayang Padang Karya Wisran Hadi. Disertasi.

Sayuti, M. (2021). Karakter Orang Minangkabau Melalui Ungkapan Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham). Jurnal Jurisprudentia, 01(01), 50–59.

Sibarani. (2004). Antropolinguistik. Medan: Penerbit Poda.

Tasmuji. (2011). Ilmu Alamiah Dasar, Ilmu Sosial Dasar, Ilmu Budaya Dasar. Surabaya: IAIN Sunan Ampel Press.

Yulika. (2012). Epistemologi Minangkabau. Yogyakarta: Gre Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-31