SUBJECTHOOD IN PUNAN TEBUNYAU LANGUAGE

KESUBJEKAN BAHASA PUNAN TEBUNYAU

Authors

  • Achmad Dicky Romadhan Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Rita Kumala Sari Universitas Borneo Tarakan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v5i2.433

Keywords:

Subject, Dayak Punan Tebunyau, Syntax

Abstract

This study aims to see how the subject property in the Dayak Punan Tebunyau language. This subject research is viewed from a grammatical point of view. This research is expected to enrich the subject matter of research, especially in the Dayak Punan Tebunyau language. The data used in this study is oral data. Oral data was taken directly from Punan Tebunyau Dayak native speakers. The data collection technique used in this study is the listening technique and note taking technique. The results of this study explain that the subjecthood in the Dayak language have similarities with the typology of fertility and are in accordance with the various test instruments used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blake, B. (2016). Relational Grammar. London: Routledge.

Budiarta, I. W. (2013). Tipologi Sintaksis Bahasa Kemak. Disertasi. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.

Comrie, B. (2017). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. University of Chicago press.

Comrie, B., & Keenan, E. L. (1983). Noun Phrase Accessibility Revisited. Language, 55(3), 649. https://doi.org/10.2307/413321

Culicover, P. W. (2017). Principles and Parameters: An Introduction to Syntactic Theory. Oxford University Press.

E., D., Foley, W. A., & van Valin, R. D. (1986). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.2307/327353

Haegeman, L. (2020). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. United States: Wiley-Blackwell.

Harris, A. C., & Campbell, L. (2016). Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Kosmas, Jeladu; Arka, I. W. (2007). Masalah Ralasi Gramatikal Bahasa Rongga: Sebuah Kajian Awal. Jurnal Ilmiah Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia, 25, 107--120.

Kridalaksana, H. (2017). Kamus Linguistik (Edisi Keempat). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Manning, C. D. (2016). Voice and Grammatical Relations in Indonesian : A New Perspective Voice and Grammatical Relations in Indonesian : A New Perspective University of Sydney The University of Queensland , Brisbane Mirriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King ( Editors ), 4(June).

Palmer. (2016). Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Romadhan, A. D. (2019). X-Komp Bahasa Indonesia: Analisis Tata Bahasa Leksikal Fungsional. Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 26–29.

Shibatani, M., & Bynon, T. (2016). Approaches to Language Typology. Clarendon Press.

Shopen, T. (2018). Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Volume 3 (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.

Sugono, D. (1995). Pelesapan Subjek Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Verhaar. (2017). Pengantar Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Wouk, F., & Artawa, I. K. (2000). Ergativity and Balinese Syntax. Oceanic Linguistics, 39(1), 212. https://doi.org/10.2307/3623225

Downloads

Published

2021-10-29

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Kata : Penelitian tentang Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Kata : Penelitian tentang Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.