Peer Review Process

Any manuscript submitted through an online process and reviewed by a partner will determine whether the manuscript is loaded or not in this journal. The reviewer for each submitted manuscript is 2 persons and has the appropriate knowledge or expertise. The review process conducted for 3 weeks. The reviewer's review is done by considering the track record of research that has been published at the national and international level.

Review of the Manuscript Process: Initial Review

  1. Read the abstract to make sure you have the expertise to review the article. Do not be afraid to say no to review the article if there is a good reason.
  2. Read the information provided by the journal for review so that you will know: a) Type of manuscript (for example, review articles, technical notes, original research) and journal expectations / parameters for that type of manuscript; B) Other journal requirements that the manuscripts must fulfill (eg, length, citation style).
  3. Know the scope and mission of the journal to ensure the topic of writing fits the scope.
  4. Ready? Read the entire manuscript at first to see if it is worth publishing - just make some notes about the main issues if they exist: a) Is the question of interest audible and significant? B) Is the design and / or method used adequate or fatal defects? (For original research paper); C) Is the result large enough to be considered for publication (or only two or more variables are presented or the result is so flawed that the paper can not be published)?
  5. What's the initial impression? If the paper is: a) Acceptable only with small comments / questions: solid, interesting, and new; Voice methodology used; The results are well presented; Discussions are well formulated with Interpretations based on logical reasoning, etc., with only a few comments / questions, turning to reviewing immediately; B) Severe disability so you have to reject it: move directly to write a review; C) Mixed somewhere in the range of "revision and resend" to "received with big changes" or you are not sure whether to reject it or not: It may be a decent paper, but there are major issues that need to be resolved